Difference Between Deontology and Consequentialism – Comparison of Key Differences. Consequentialism or deontology? Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Search: Academic disciplines Business Concepts Crime Culture Economy Education Energy Events Food and drink Geography Government Health Human behavior Humanities Knowledge Law Life Mind Objects Organizations People Philosophy Society Sports Universe World Arts Lists Glossaries Buddy … To follow the set rules and regulations can be one of the weaknesses and strengths of deontology. Thus, this theory simply requires people to follow rules and do their duty. Some behaviors, such as altruistic motives’ lying, helps poor person’s burglary, safeguards most people benefit to small number of people right infringement, can be adopted by the consequentialism as moral, but actually cannot be adopted by the deontology as moral. In utilitarianism, consequences of an action are determined by a ‘greatest good for the greatest number’. Means really don't have any individual existence. Briefly discuss the differences between Bentham and Mill’s versions of utilitarianism. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. ELI5:Deontology vs Consequentialism. ★ Consequentialism vs deontology: Add an external link to your content for free. These cookies do not store any personal information. The theory takes root from utilitarianism, and stresses on the fact that the morality of an action depends on its consequences. The consequentialism viewpoint is that morally right act is the one that gives good results. Duckweed Jones. US$ 39.95. Consequentialism and deontology are two such theories that are classified under ethics of conduct, i.e., our behavior and the way we conduct ourselves. Some philosophers think that that is as it should be – that there is no important distinction between conse- quentialism and deontology. In consequentialism, it is the results of action that define right behavior. Kant’s deontological ethics. 6789 Quail Hill Pkwy, Suite 211 Irvine CA 92603. It's just silly and sociologically implausible. 3. Furthermore, the more good results an act produces, the better or more right that act will be. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. “Deontology.” Ethics Unwrapped, Available here. In such a scenario, deontology would just instantly collapse and virtue ethics would be meaningless. While going through a trying situation, an individual tends to do what is right at that time, for it does not make sense to think about the likes of deontology or consequentialism. Home » Public » People » Philosophy » What is the Difference Between Deontology and Consequentialism. Deontology is associated with philosopher Immanuel Kant, who believed that ethical actions follow universal moral laws. (deontology and consequentialism) i don't even come here much. Of these, consequentialism determines the rightness or wrongness of actions by examining its consequences. It does not let the end justify the means. Deontology is a theory that concentrates itself in making choices that are morally required, prohibited or just (Moore and Alexander, 2007). For long consequentialism, the debate has been a class of normative ethical theories which believe that the results of individual conduct should be the basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of the behavior. Some philosophers have … It then highlights principlism, a useful approach to medical ethics that breaks down issues into four major principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. In fact, the two courses I took on philosophy in college (Honors courses on ancient Greek ethics and … Forum Member 03/07/06 - 18:49 in Politics #1. Instant access to the full article PDF. As mentioned earlier, this theory solely focuses on ideals. Hasa has a BA degree in English, French and Translation studies. “Ethics – Introduction to Ethics: Duty-Based Ethics.” BBC, Available here.2. Deontology vs. Consequentialism Essay Sample. 0 Altmetric. Without applying consequentialism, I believe you will find deontology lacking when it comes to creating a satisfactory moral theory. Other. The term deontological was first used to describe the current, specialised definition by C. D. Broad in … They clash because each offers a different approach to determining “right” from “wrong.” For example, the most common claim has to do with the demanding nature of the theory, for which there are several responses. Meanwhile, deontology … For elaborations upon this view, see Sen (2000, pp. 3-6, 2009, pp. However, consequentialism focuses on judging the moral worth of the results of the actions and deontological ethics focuses on judging the actions themselves. It focuses on identifying the moral conduct through which the right actions can be carried out and happiness can be maximized. The virtual ethics model focuses on good characteristics. What it considers is the ideals and values you have followed that have resulted in the best possible action. Deontology Versus Consequentialism Utilitarianism Parli Debate It is more duty-oriented, whereas teleology is more result-oriented. To describe this in general terms, this deontological theory focuses on the inputs leading to actions rather than outcomes produced by those inputs. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Next, I apply the method of reflective equilibrium to the deontology/consequentialism debate, and conclude that consequentialism is the correct ethical framework. 480-482, 2005, pp. I. One of the most stated examples of this concept is in nursing. Her areas of interests include literature, language, linguistics and also food. Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. What is the Difference Between Deontology and Consequentialism, Difference Between Deontology and Consequentialism. In this scenario, he failed in his duty as a father, and the consequences of his act would affect his entire family. Is there anyone out there that can break this down into very simplistic differences for me? Briefly discuss the differences between Bentham and Mill’s versions of utilitarianism. It's also, as @ Pfhorrest has pointed out, somewhat of a false dichotomy, or perhaps more generally a purely thought out question. Assume that a nurse is tending to a cancer patient, and is faced with the dilemma of whether or not to tell him the truth that he has only a few months to live. 3195 Accesses. It then highlights principlism, a useful approach to medical ethics that breaks down issues into four major principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. She is currently reading for a Masters degree in English. I was writing an assignment where I had to answer a question from a deontological perspective. Your friend wants to know whether you like the gift. debate that is currently going on about the acceptability of torture can be understood as a debate about whether or not there are some things that are morally unjustifiable no matter what the consequences. Utilitarianism holds that the right action is one that produces the greatest good/pleasure (and least pain) for the greatest number of people. " Utilitarianism is a very well known example of Consequen-tialism, speci cally Act Consequentialism. In this situation, I chose to do so, but I did not have an openly communication with my manager about my ethical dilemma. The center-piece of Kant's deontological sensibility is the prioritization of duties over consequences. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. ethics, consequentialism, and deontology. Briefly discuss the differences between Bentham and Mill’s versions of utilitarianism. In this essay, I will more concentrate on consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, and deontology to make compare and contrast analysis of each other and how each case works differently and causes divergent result in the same scenario. Deontology and consequentialism are two contrasting normative ethical theories that determine the morality of an action. bacchantic enigma Posts: 3,460. We hope you enjoy this website. Its four conditions are 67 supposed to be jointly necessary for self-evidence, but the second tells 68 us to ascertain ‘the self-evidence of the proposition’. Copyright © Opinion Front & Buzzle.com, Inc.